Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537556›Full record

ReviewOTO open

New Medical Device and Therapeutic Approvals in Otolaryngology: State of the Art Review of 2019.

Anais Rameau, Robert Stephen Hong, Hamid Djalilian, Isaac David Erbele, Katie M Phillips, Robson Capasso, Austin S Rose, Michael Joel Brenner, Peter Luke Santa Maria

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anais RameauMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Robert Stephen HongMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Hamid DjalilianMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Isaac David ErbeleMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Katie M PhillipsMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Robson CapassoMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Austin S RoseMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Michael Joel BrennerMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Peter Luke Santa MariaMedicalDevicesandDrugsCommittee,AmericanAcademyofOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
American Academy of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery · USStanford University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review new devices and drugs relevant to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019. DATA SOURCES: Approval notifications for 2019 were extracted from the ENT (ear, nose, and throat) and general and plastic surgery sections of the FDA's medical devices and therapeutics listings. REVIEW

methodsNew therapeutics and medical devices identified from the query were analyzed by members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's Medical Devices and Drugs Committee. Technologies were assessed by 2 independent reviewers to ascertain relevance to otolaryngology, prioritized, and classified to subspecialty field with critical review based on extant scientific literature.

conclusionsQuery of the FDA drug and device database returned 105 ENT devices (50 cleared, 55 with premarket approval, and 0 de novo), 543 general and plastic surgery devices (372 cleared, 170 with premarket approval, and 1 de novo), and 46 new otolaryngology-relevant drug approvals that occurred in 2019. Advances spanned all subspecialty areas with otology predominating, primarily due to hearing-related technologies. While scientific evidence was available for all new devices, there was significant heterogeneity in rigor of supporting scientific data. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Technological and pharmaceutical innovation is an important catalyst for advances in the surgical specialties. Familiarity with new devices and therapeutics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery ensures that clinicians keep abreast of developments with potential to improve prevailing standards of care.

Indexed as

drugFDAmedical devicetherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID32537556
PMCPMC7268138
OpenAlexW3033776317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.