ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2019
Intrascanner Reproducibility of an SPM-based Head MR-based Attenuation Correction Method.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationships between local metabolic activity and distributed functional connectivity in major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Network-specific metabolic and haemodynamic effects elicited by non-invasive brain stimulation.Nature. Mental health · 2023Article
- MR-based Attenuation Correction for Brain PET Using 3D Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2021Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, an exhaustive examination of 11 state of the art MR-based attenuation correction (AC) concluded that there are currently a few methods showing similar results compared to the gold-standard, CT-based AC. While the study presented a thorough portfolio of metrics to quantify accuracy (bias) and quality, it lacked one of the most important metrics to quantify robustness that is critical for its clinical applicability: intrascanner reproducibility (repeatability). In this work, we provide for the first time a study of the repeatability of one of the outperforming brain MR-based AC methods: the SPM-based pseudo-CT approach. 22 subjects undergoing 3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.