Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537375›Full record

Article3 Biotech2020

Screening of yeasts isolated from

Guangsen Fan, Liujie Cheng, Zhilei Fu, Baoguo Sun, Chao Teng, Xueyu Jiang, Xiuting Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. EngineeringFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the biotechnological potential ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Screening of Yeasts Isolated fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Screening a Strain ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guangsen Fan *Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Liujie Cheng *Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Zhilei FuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Baoguo SunBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Chao TengBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Xueyu JiangSchool of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.
Xiuting LiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, 100048 China.ORCID 0000-0002-2493-417X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2-Phenylethanol (2-PE) with a pleasant rose-like odor is a valuable aroma compound used in many fields. 2-PE production by yeast is considered a promising alternative to chemical synthesis and extraction from natural materials. In this report, the strain YF1702 produced a significantly higher level of 2-PE when compared with other strains isolated from

Indexed as

2-PhenylethanolBaijiuL-PhenylalanineOptimizationPichia kudriavzevii

Identifiers

PMID32537375
PMCPMC7261310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.