Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537335›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Controversies in Surgical Management of Lymphedema.

Summer E Hanson, Edward I Chang, Mark V Schaverien, Carrie Chu, Jesse C Selber, Matthew M Hanasono

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05136079 (Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05136079 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prophylactic LYMphatic Reconstruction (LYMbR) to Prevent Lymphedema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlberta Health Services, CalgaryRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsLymphedema of Limb, Malignant Skin NeoplasmArmsProphylactic lymphaticonvenous anastomosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Summer E HansonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Edward I ChangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Mark V SchaverienDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Carrie ChuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Jesse C SelberDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Matthew M HanasonoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical treatment of lymphedema has expanded in recent years. Lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer are both modern techniques to address the physiologic dysfunction associated with secondary lymphedema. While efficacy of both techniques has been demonstrated in numerous studies, there are several questions that remain. Here, the authors discuss the most pertinent controversies in our practice as well as the current state of surgical management of lymphedema.

Identifiers

PMID32537335
PMCPMC7253258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.