Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537334›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program.

Mark V Schaverien, Donald P Baumann, Jesse C Selber, Edward I Chang, Matthew M Hanasono, Carrie Chu, Summer E Hanson, Charles E Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reimagining Recruitment and Retention in Academic Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Primer for Success as an Early Career Academic Plastic Surgeon.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  7. Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge of Lymphedema.International journal of vascular medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark V SchaverienDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Donald P BaumannDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Jesse C SelberDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Edward I ChangDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Matthew M HanasonoDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Carrie ChuDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Summer E HansonDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
Charles E ButlerDivision of Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphedema is a debilitating clinical condition predominantly affecting survivors of cancer. It adversely affects patients' quality of life and results in substantial cost burdens to both patients and the healthcare system. Specialist lymphedema care is optimally provided within integrated clinical programs that align the necessary specialties to provide patient-focused, multidisciplinary, structured, and coordinated care. This article examines our experience building a specialist lymphedema academic program.

methodsWe describe the critical components necessary for constructing a multidisciplinary comprehensive academic lymphedema program. Furthermore, lessons learned from our experience building a successful lymphedema program are discussed.

resultsBuilding a comprehensive academic lymphedema program requires institutional support and engagement of stakeholders to establish the necessary infrastructure for comprehensive patient care. This includes the infrastructure for outpatient clinical assessment, diagnostic investigations, radiological imaging, collection of outcomes metrics, non-surgical treatment delivered by lymphedema-specialist therapists, surgical procedures using specialized equipment, and integration of an outpatient framework for comprehensive patient evaluation during follow-up at standardized time intervals.

conclusionsThis article examines our experience building a multidisciplinary comprehensive academic lymphedema program and provides a structured roadmap to benefit others that are embarking on this mission.

Identifiers

PMID32537334
PMCPMC7253282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.