Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537327›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Fundamentals of Extracellular Matrix Biomaterial Assimilation: Effect of Suture Type on Attachment Strength and Cell Repopulation.

David M Adelman, Kevin G Cornwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M AdelmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex.
Kevin G CornwellIntegra LifeSciences, Boston, Mass.
Integra LifeSciences (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical results with extracellular matrix biomaterials are confounded by expectations of material response based on years of experience with permanent or degradable synthetic polymers. However, the remodeling or assimilation of extracellular matrix biomaterials is dictated by cell-mediated processes rather than fibrous encapsulation or hydrolytic degradation. Previously, we found that tissue adherence and revascularization were dictated by proximity with de-epithelialized host tissue. We now investigate the effects of polymer and fixation type on attachment strength and rate of cell repopulation in an intra-abdominal implant model.

methodsAn intra-abdominal implant model in rats was used to probe assimilation properties at 4 weeks and 12 weeks with permanent and degradable suture types as well a combination of suture and biologic attachment (mesothelial abrasion). The mechanical strength of the attachment was measured by peel testing and the repopulation by automated cell counting of histologic sections.

resultsThe intensity of the biologic response was greater with degradable polymers than permanent polypropylene. Tissue attachment strength ranged from 2 to 15 N but changed in elasticity with time. The magnitude and distribution of cell repopulation was highly variable by suture type but ultimately did not affect the long-term strength of the soft tissue attachment.

conclusionsThe tissue approximating polymer sutures were stretchy and of similar strength regardless of degradation rate or polymer type. The strongest attachment, most rapid repopulation of the deep matrix regions, and most uniform distribution of cells were found with the addition of biologic attachment.

Identifiers

PMID32537327
PMCPMC7253251
OpenAlexW3011007654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.