ArticleCureus2020
Visceral Mobilization and Functional Constipation in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservative, physical and surgical interventions for managing faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of visceral fascial therapy targeting visceral dysfunctions outcome: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Pooled it
- Beyond Biofeedback: Expanding Perspectives on Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Evacuation Disorders.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- The Effect of Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Quality of Life and Postural Stability in Women with Endometriosis and Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Non-Controlled Before-After Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Meta-epidemiologic review: blinding and sham treatment in clinical trial design for osteopathic manipulative treatment research.International journal of osteopathic medicine : IJOM · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Acupoint Catgut Embedding for the Treatment of Poststroke Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Interoception and Emotion: A Potential Mechanism for Intervention With Manual Treatment.Cureus · 2021Review
- Osteopathic Palpation of the Heart.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Chronic functional constipation is common among stroke survivors. Osteopathy is an effective form of treatment as it acts on the structures surrounding the bowels that may have lost their normal capacity of resilience. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of visceral mobilization on symptoms of functional constipation and static balance in stroke survivors. Materials and methods Thirty stroke survivors met the eligibility criteria and were randomly allocated to a group physical therapy and visceral manipulation or a group physical therapy. Both groups were submitted to conventional physical therapy. The group physical therapy and visceral manipulation was also submitted to visceral mobilization (sphincter inhibition and mobilization of the large intestine), whereas the group physical therapy was submitted to a sham procedure (superficial touching over the intestines). Evaluations were conducted prior to the intervention, immediately after the first intervention session and one week after the end of the five sessions. At each evaluation, the static balance was analyzed using a computerized plantar pressure sensor. Moreover, an intestinal symptoms rating scale was administered during the pre-intervention evaluation, and one week after the end of the intervention. Results Significant improvements were found in intestinal symptoms (frequency of bowel movements, abdominal pain/discomfort, difficulty eliminating stools, sensation of intestinal swelling or distention, difficulty eliminating gas, sensation of incomplete bowel movement and, anal pain during bowel movement) and static balance (anteroposterior sway: F = 82.06, p = 0.0001; velocity of anteroposterior sway: F = 17.6, p = 0.001; and velocity of mediolateral sway: F = 4.41, p = 0.01). Conclusion Visceral mobilization can be part of a neurologic rehabilitation program to improve symptoms of constipation and static balance in stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.