Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537212›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

A cross-cultural investigation of young children's spontaneous invention of tool use behaviours.

Karri Neldner, Eva Reindl, Claudio Tennie, Julie Grant, Keyan Tomaselli, Mark Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karri NeldnerEarly Cognitive Development Centre, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-5679
Eva ReindlSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1594-1367
Claudio TennieDepartment of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-4925
Julie GrantDepartment of Communication, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4464-9429
Keyan TomaselliDepartment of Communication, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-0726
Mark NielsenEarly Cognitive Development Centre, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0402-8372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through the mechanisms of observation, imitation and teaching, young children readily pick up the tool using behaviours of their culture. However, little is known about the baseline abilities of children's tool use: what they might be capable of inventing on their own in the absence of socially provided information. It has been shown that children can spontaneously invent 11 of 12 candidate tool using behaviours observed within the foraging behaviours of wild non-human apes (Reindl

Indexed as

cognitive developmentcross-cultural psychologydevelopmental psychologyphysical cognitionproblem solvingtool use

Identifiers

PMID32537212
PMCPMC7277275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.