Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537197›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Construction and forensic application of 20 highly polymorphic microhaplotypes.

Aliye Kureshi, Jienan Li, Dan Wen, Shule Sun, Zedeng Yang, Lagabaiyila Zha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aliye KureshiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6929-3372
Jienan LiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-1707
Dan WenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Shule SunDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Zedeng YangDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, No. 172, Tongzipo Road, Changsha 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Lagabaiyila ZhaShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2207-4441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microhaplotype markers have become an important research focus in forensic genetics. However, many reported microhaplotype markers have limited polymorphisms. In this study, we developed a set of highly polymorphic microhaplotype markers based on tri-allelic single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Eleven newly discovered microhaplotypes along with nine previously identified in our laboratory were studied. The microhaplotype genotypes of unrelated individuals and familial samples were generated on the MiSeq PE300 platform. These 20 loci have an average greater than 3.5 effective number of alleles. Over the whole set, the cumulative power of discrimination was 1-3.3 × 10

Indexed as

genetic markersindividual identificationmicrohaplotype

Identifiers

PMID32537197
PMCPMC7277291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.