Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537194›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

A hybrid gravity and route choice model to assess vector traffic in large-scale road networks.

S M Fischer, M Beck, L-M Herborg, M A Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S M FischerDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8913-9575
M BeckConservation Science Section, BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
L-M HerborgInstitute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada.
M A LewisDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-7426
University of Alberta · CAFisheries and Oceans Canada · CAMinistry of Environment · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human traffic along roads can be a major vector for infectious diseases and invasive species. Though most road traffic is local, a small number of long-distance trips can suffice to move an invasion or disease front forward. Therefore, understanding how many agents travel over long distances and which routes they choose is key to successful management of diseases and invasions. Stochastic gravity models have been used to estimate the distribution of trips between origins and destinations of agents. However, in large-scale systems, it is hard to collect the data required to fit these models, as the number of long-distance travellers is small, and origins and destinations can have multiple access points. Therefore, gravity models often provide only relative measures of the agent flow. Furthermore, gravity models yield no insights into which roads agents use. We resolve these issues by combining a stochastic gravity model with a stochastic route choice model. Our hybrid model can be fitted to survey data collected at roads that are used by many long-distance travellers. This decreases the sampling effort, allows us to obtain absolute predictions of both vector pressure and pathways, and permits rigorous model validation. After introducing our approach in general terms, we demonstrate its benefits by applying it to the potential invasion of zebra and quagga mussels (

Indexed as

gravity modelhierarchical modelinfectious diseaseinvasive speciespropagule pressurezebra mussel

Identifiers

PMID32537194
PMCPMC7277278
OpenAlexW3026885792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.