Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537176›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2020

Radiosensitizers in the temozolomide era for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Peter Mathen, Lindsay Rowe, Megan Mackey, DeeDee Smart, Philip Tofilon, Kevin Camphausen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Application of nano-radiosensitizers in combination cancer therapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter MathenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1077-120X
Lindsay RoweRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Megan MackeyRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
DeeDee SmartRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Philip TofilonRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kevin CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Pre-clinical Development of Radiation Sensitizers for Patients with GlioblastomaZIASC010372 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$12.0M
Microenvironmental regulation of glioblastoma radiosensitivityZIABC011372 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TOFILON, PHILIP · 2011 to 2025
$11.7M
Neuropsychological outcome measures in patients receiving whole brain radiationZIABC011333 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SMART, DEEDEE · 2010 to 2025
$4.6M
Metabolic imaging of the effects of brain radiotherapyZIABC011790 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SMART, DEEDEE · 2017 to 2025
$2.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a challenging diagnosis with almost universally poor prognosis. Though the survival advantage of postoperative radiation (RT) is well established, around 90% of patients will fail in the RT field. The high likelihood of local failure suggests the efficacy of RT needs to be improved to improve clinical outcomes. Radiosensitizers are an established method of enhancing RT cell killing through the addition of a pharmaceutical agent. Though the majority of trials using radiosensitizers have historically been unsuccessful, there continues to be interest with a variety of approaches having been employed. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, and a number of other molecularly targeted agents have all been investigated as potential methods of radiosensitization in the temozolomide era. Outcomes have varied both in terms of toxicity and survival, but some agents such as valproic acid and bortezomib have demonstrated promising results. However, reporting of results in phase 2 trials in newly diagnosed GBM have been inconsistent, with no standard in reporting progression-free survival and toxicity. There is a pressing need for investigation of new agents; however, nearly all phase 3 trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have demonstrated no improvement in outcomes. One proposed explanation for this is the selection of agents lacking sufficient preclinical data and/or based on poorly designed phase 2 trials. Radiosensitization may represent a viable strategy for improving GBM outcomes in newly diagnosed patients, and further investigation using agents with promising phase 2 data is warranted.

Indexed as

glioblastomagliomanewly diagnosedradiosensitizertemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID32537176
PMCPMC7274183
OpenAlexW2994108095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.