Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537143›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2020

Innovative use of data sources: a cross-sectional study of data linkage and artificial intelligence practices across European countries.

Romana Haneef, Marie Delnord, Michel Vernay, Emmanuelle Bauchet, Rita Gaidelyte, Herman Van Oyen, Zeynep Or, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Luigi Palmieri, Peter Achterberg and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Identifying diseases in claims data using a machine learning approach - a case from Switzerland.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Towards trust-based governance of health data research.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Challenges and opportunities for using population health data to investigate cancer survivors' quality of life in Australia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhancing Human Biomonitoring Studies through Linkage to Administrative Registers-Status in Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

Romana HaneefDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries, Santé Publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7741-0268
Marie DelnordEpidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel VernayDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries, Santé Publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France.
Emmanuelle BauchetDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries, Santé Publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France.
Rita GaidelyteHealth information centre, Institute of hygiene, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Herman Van OyenEpidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Zeynep OrInstitute of research and information for health economics, Paris, France.
Beatriz Pérez-GómezNational Centre for Epidemiology & CIBERESP, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Luigi PalmieriDepartment of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-metabolic Diseases and Aging, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Peter AchterbergNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Mariken TijhuisNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Metka ZaletelNational Institute of Public Health (NIJZ), Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Stefan Mathis-EdenhoferThe Austrian National Public Health Institute (Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, GÖG), Vienna, Austria.
Ondřej MájekInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Håkon HaaheimThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.
Hanna TolonenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Anne GallayDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Injuries, Santé Publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France.
Santé Publique France · FRNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIGesundheit Österreich · ATGhent University · BEInstitut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé · FRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESLithuanian Social Research Centre · LTMasaryk University · CZNational Institute of Public Health · SINorwegian Directorate of Health · NOSciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of data generated from different sources is increasing with the possibility to link these data sources with each other. However, linked administrative data can be complex to use and may require advanced expertise and skills in statistical analysis. The main objectives of this study were to describe the current use of data linkage at the individual level and artificial intelligence (AI) in routine public health activities, to identify the related estimated health indicators (i.e., outcome and intervention indicators) and health determinants of non-communicable diseases and the obstacles to linking different data sources.

methodWe performed a survey across European countries to explore the current practices applied by national institutes of public health, health information and statistics for innovative use of data sources (i.e., the use of data linkage and/or AI).

resultsThe use of data linkage and AI at national institutes of public health, health information and statistics in Europe varies. The majority of European countries use data linkage in routine by applying a deterministic method or a combination of two types of linkages (i.e., deterministic & probabilistic) for public health surveillance and research purposes. The use of AI to estimate health indicators is not frequent at national institutes of public health, health information and statistics. Using linked data, 46 health outcome indicators, 34 health determinants and 23 health intervention indicators were estimated in routine. The complex data regulation laws, lack of human resources, skills and problems with data governance, were reported by European countries as obstacles to routine data linkage for public health surveillance and research.

conclusionsOur results highlight that the majority of European countries have integrated data linkage in their routine public health activities but only a few use AI. A sustainable national health information system and a robust data governance framework allowing to link different data sources are essential to support evidence-informed health policy development. Building analytical capacity and raising awareness of the added value of data linkage in national institutes is necessary for improving the use of linked data in order to improve the quality of public health surveillance and monitoring activities.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHealth indicatorsHealth informationHealth status monitoringInnovationLinked dataMachine learning techniquePublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID32537143
PMCPMC7288525
OpenAlexW3035379696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.