Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32536997›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020

A mid-pregnancy risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the maternal status in combination with ultrasound and serological findings.

Ya-Zhong Zhang, Lei Zhou, Luobing Tian, Xin Li, Guyue Zhang, Jiang-Yuan Qin, Dan-Dan Zhang, Hui Fang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ya-Zhong ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Lei ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Luobing TianDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Xin LiDepartment of Imaging, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Guyue ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Jiang-Yuan QinDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Dan-Dan ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Hui FangDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China.
Tangshan Gongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although previous studies have proposed predictive models of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on maternal status, they do not always provide reliable results. The present study aimed to create a novel model that included ultrasound data of maternal fat distribution and serum inflammatory factors. The clinical data of 1,158 pregnant women treated at Tangshan Gongren Hospital and eight other flagship hospitals in Tangshan, including the First Hospital of Tangshan Gongren Hospital group, Ninth Hospital of Tangshan Gongren Hospital group, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group rehabilitation hospital, Tangshan railway central hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Fengnan hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Qianan Yanshan hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Qianxi Kangli hospital and Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Jidong Sub-hospital, were analyzed following the division of subjects into GDM and non-GDM groups according to their diagnostic results at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the significance of the maternal clinical parameters for GDM diagnosis and a GDM prediction model was established using stepwise regression analysis. The predictive value of the model was evaluated using a Homer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The model demonstrated that age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, a family history of diabetes mellitus, polycystic ovary syndrome, a history of GDM, high systolic pressures, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, triglyceride levels, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein, increased subcutaneous fat thickness and visceral fat thickness were all correlated with an increased GDM risk (all P<0.01). The area under the curve value was 0.911 (95% CI, 0.893-0.930). Overall, the results indicated that the current model, which included ultrasound and serological data, may be a more effective predictor of GDM compared with other single predictor models. In conclusion, the present study developed a tool to determine the risk of GDM in pregnant women during the second trimester. This prediction model, based on various risk factors, demonstrated a high predictive value for the GDM occurrence in pregnant women in China and may prove useful in guiding future clinical practice.

Indexed as

gestational diabetes mellitusrisk factorsrisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID32536997
PMCPMC7282073
OpenAlexW3019071715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.