ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
A mid-pregnancy risk prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the maternal status in combination with ultrasound and serological findings.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Inflammatory Biomarkers in Relation to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Associations between maternal visceral fat in mid-pregnancy and subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Machine learning based model for the early detection of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- Maternal Visceral Fat in Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- MIDO GDM: an innovative artificial intelligence-based prediction model for the development of gestational diabetes in Mexican women.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of risk prediction model for gestational diabetes based on a nomogram.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Disease-Associated MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers of First-Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Absence of Other Pregnancy-Related Complications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although previous studies have proposed predictive models of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on maternal status, they do not always provide reliable results. The present study aimed to create a novel model that included ultrasound data of maternal fat distribution and serum inflammatory factors. The clinical data of 1,158 pregnant women treated at Tangshan Gongren Hospital and eight other flagship hospitals in Tangshan, including the First Hospital of Tangshan Gongren Hospital group, Ninth Hospital of Tangshan Gongren Hospital group, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group rehabilitation hospital, Tangshan railway central hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Fengnan hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Qianan Yanshan hospital, Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Qianxi Kangli hospital and Tangshan Gongren Hospital group Jidong Sub-hospital, were analyzed following the division of subjects into GDM and non-GDM groups according to their diagnostic results at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the significance of the maternal clinical parameters for GDM diagnosis and a GDM prediction model was established using stepwise regression analysis. The predictive value of the model was evaluated using a Homer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The model demonstrated that age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, a family history of diabetes mellitus, polycystic ovary syndrome, a history of GDM, high systolic pressures, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, triglyceride levels, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein, increased subcutaneous fat thickness and visceral fat thickness were all correlated with an increased GDM risk (all P<0.01). The area under the curve value was 0.911 (95% CI, 0.893-0.930). Overall, the results indicated that the current model, which included ultrasound and serological data, may be a more effective predictor of GDM compared with other single predictor models. In conclusion, the present study developed a tool to determine the risk of GDM in pregnant women during the second trimester. This prediction model, based on various risk factors, demonstrated a high predictive value for the GDM occurrence in pregnant women in China and may prove useful in guiding future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.