Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32536677›Full record

Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020

The Comparison of the Efficacy of Baloxavir and Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Patients with Influenza A in Clinical Practice.

Naoko Yoshii, Yoshihiro Tochino, Masashi Fujioka, Hiromi Sakazaki, Naomi Maruyama, Kazuhisa Asai, Hiroshi Kakeya, Haruo Shintaku, Tomoya Kawaguchi

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoko YoshiiDepartment of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Yoshihiro TochinoDepartment of Medical Education and General Practice, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Masashi FujiokaFujioka Pediatric Clinic, Japan.
Hiromi SakazakiSakazaki Child Clinic, Japan.
Naomi MaruyamaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Kazuhisa AsaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Hiroshi KakeyaDepartment of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Haruo ShintakuDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Tomoya KawaguchiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Japan.
Osaka City University · JPFujimoto Dental and Oral Surgery Clinic · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Baloxavir marboxil is a novel anti-influenza drug reported to have an early antiviral effect, although it also causes the appearance of variant viruses with a reduced susceptibility to baloxavir. In Japan, four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) have been commonly used to treat patients with influenza. In clinical practice, the differences in the effects of baloxavir and NAIs have not been sufficiently examined. Our objective was to clarify the clinical differences in efficacy between baloxavir and NAIs. Methods A multicenter, observational study was conducted using postcard questionnaires during the 2018-19 influenza season. Patients who were prescribed anti-influenza drugs were provided postcard questionnaires asking about their background characteristics and their body temperatures. The factors associated with the early alleviation of the fever were analyzed, and the duration of the fever was compared between the baloxavir group and the NAI group. Results A total of 295 patients with influenza A, ranging in age from 0-91 years old, were enrolled in this study. A multivariate analysis showed that treatment with baloxavir and a duration from the onset to the start of treatment ≥2.5 days were factors contributing to the early alleviation of the fever from the start of treatment. The duration of the fever was significantly shorter in the baloxavir group than in the NAI group (p=0.002). Conclusion The present survey showed that baloxavir was significantly more effective than NAIs for treating patients with influenza A in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntiviral AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDibenzothiepinsEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanJapanMaleAntiviral AgentsbaloxavirDibenzothiepinsEnzyme InhibitorsMorpholinesNeuraminidaseOxazinesPyridinesPyridonesThiepinsTriazinesbaloxavir marboxilinfluenzaneuraminidase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID32536677
PMCPMC7364256
OpenAlexW3035712886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.