Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32535915›Full record

ArticleHeadache2020

What are Headache Smartphone Application (App) Users Actually Looking for in Apps: A Qualitative Analysis of App Reviews to Determine a Patient Centered Approach to Headache Smartphone Apps.

Mia T Minen, Tyler Gumpel, Seher Ali, Fatoumata Sow, Kaitlyn Toy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a text message-based headache diary in adolescents and children.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Computerized migraine diagnostic tools: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [Digitalization in headache therapy].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mia T MinenDivision of Headache, Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Tyler GumpelDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Seher AliDepartment of Biotechnology, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Fatoumata SowDepartment of Biology, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Kaitlyn ToyDepartment of Biochemistry, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Progressive Muscle Relaxation for Chronic Pain in an Acute Care SettingK23AT009706 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MINEN, MIA · 2018 to 2022
$923k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany headache smartphone applications (apps) are commercially available. A Modified Delphi Study aimed to determine specialists' expectations of what a headache app should entail but consumer expectations of headache apps have not been evaluated extensively.

objectiveTo evaluate publicly available reviews of headache apps to understand app features that motivate the consumers to use apps.

methodsThe Google Play and Apple App Stores were systematically searched for headache/migraine diary apps with 10+ consumer reviews. A maximum of 300 "Most Helpful" reviews for each app were extracted. Four coders coded reviews and resolved discrepancies. Themes and subthemes were created based on codes used 5+ times.

resultsAbout 15 apps met the study criteria (9 Android, 6 IOS). 945 reviews were coded. Four themes emerged: (1) App allows users to track headache characteristics, potential triggers, and treatments; (2) App usability; (3) Personalization and features to assess trends in data are key motivators for app use; (4) Ease with exportation and viewing data is critical. DISCUSSION: A user-centered design with the ability to (1) customize key features including headache characteristics, potential triggers, and treatments, (2) assess trends in data, and (3) view and export data would best optimize headache smartphone applications based on consumer preference.

Indexed as

HeadacheMigraine DisordersMobile ApplicationsPatient PreferenceUser-Computer InterfaceAdultDelphi TechniqueHumansQualitative ResearchSmartphonedigital healthheadachemHealthmigraineuser engagement

Identifiers

PMID32535915
PMCPMC8640611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.