Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Ming-Yi Lu *Shandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Shuang Shi *Shandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xu LiShandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Shu-Juan LianShandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Yan XuFaculty of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Rong-Bo GuoShandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production & Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China. guorb@qibebt.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-0835
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNDalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy · CNQingdao University of Science and Technology · CN
Funding
Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA 21060400Heilongjiang R&D Program of Application and Advanced Technology GA19B202Key R&D Project of Shandong Province 2017CXGC0305Major independent innovation projects of Qingdao 8-1-1-96-zhzNational Key R&D Program of China 2017YFD0800801-03Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences QIBEBT I201906the 66th general funding from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 228223
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Anaerobic digested residue (DR) is the main by-product from biogas plants, and it is predominantly used as organic fertilizer after composting. To resolve the problems of long duration and nitrogen loss in conventional composting, bulking agents are always added during the composting process. In this study, oyster shell (OS) was used as a bulking agent for DR composting. Four treatments were conducted by mixing DR and OS at different concentrations (0%, 10%, 20% and 30%, based on wet weight) and then composting the mixtures for 40 days. The results showed that the organic matter (OM) degradation efficiency was enhanced by 5.62%, 12.15% and 16.98% with increasing amounts of OS addition. The increased content of microbial biomass carbon in the compost indicated a suitable living environment for aerobic microbes with added OS, which could explain the increased OM degradation efficiency. Compared with the control, the NH
Indexed as
CompostingOstreidaeAnaerobiosisAnimalsFertilizersManureNitrogenSoilFertilizersManureNitrogenSoilAmmonia emissionsBulking agentCompostDigested residueGreenhouse gas
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Addition of oyster shell to enhance organic matter degradation and nitrogen conservation during anaerobic digestate composting. · full record | OpenQuestion