SynthesisHeart failure reviews2022
A systematic review on focal takotsubo syndrome: a not-so-small matter.
Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photon-counting CT of midventricular takotsubo cardiomyopathy.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Reversibility of myocardial oedema and regional wall motion abnormalities in a non-Takotsubo-like pattern in a lightning strike survivor detected by cardiac MRI: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A case of shock after STEMI: Think beyond the cardiogenic one.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- A contemporary update on cancer and takotsubo syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Stepwise approach for diagnosis and management of Takotsubo syndrome with cardiac imaging tools.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular Imaging in Stress Cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo Syndrome).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Novel Imaging and Genetic Risk Markers in Takotsubo Syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A focal contraction pattern in takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is considered rare. Due to its peculiar presentation, which includes segmental left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), the focal TTS pattern may be hardly differentiable from other entities, such as myocarditis or myocardial infarction. We performed a comprehensive systematic literature review researching for works in English published in Journals indexed in Embase, available online for consultation, using the following keywords (in Title and/or Abstract): ("takotsubo" OR "broken heart" OR "apical ballooning" OR "stress cardiomyopathy") AND ("focal" OR "atypical" OR "variant" OR "segments"). Thirty-three papers were retrieved: 17 case reports, 6 case series, and 10 population studies-with a total of 166 focal TTS patients. Prevalence of focal TTS ranged between 0.1% and 14% (pooled mean: 2.8%). Mean age of onset (58 years), gender distribution (80% of females), and type of triggers appeared similar to those reported in typical TTS. RWMA more frequently involved the interventricular septum and the anterolateral LV segments, with often preserved LV ejection fraction. In the majority of focal TTS reports that included adequate ECG information (n = 13), abnormalities were localized and not diffuse, always matching RWMA, and in 3 cases, reciprocal changes were observed. No in-hospital nor long-term deaths were reported. The focal TTS contraction pattern may be more prevalent than currently reported. Though possibly presenting with similar demographic background compared with typical TTS, the focal variant might be characterized by peculiar ECG modifications and better prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.