Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32535656›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

Indicated prevention interventions for anxiety in children and adolescents: a review and meta-analysis of school-based programs.

Siobhan Hugh-Jones, Sophie Beckett, Ella Tumelty, Pavan Mallikarjun

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siobhan Hugh-JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. s.hugh-jones@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-1203
Sophie BeckettThe Barberry National Centre for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2FG, UK.
Ella TumeltyThe Barberry National Centre for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2FG, UK.
Pavan MallikarjunThe Barberry National Centre for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2FG, UK.
Centre for Mental Health · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are among the most common youth mental health disorders. Early intervention can reduce elevated anxiety symptoms. School-based interventions exist but it is unclear how effective targeted approaches are for reducing symptoms of anxiety. This review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of school-based indicated interventions for symptomatic children and adolescents. The study was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42018087628]. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library for randomised-controlled trials comparing indicated programs for child and adolescent (5-18 years) anxiety to active or inactive control groups. Data were extracted from papers up to December 2019. The primary outcome was efficacy (mean change in anxiety symptom scores). Sub-group and sensitivity analyses explored intervention intensity and control type. We identified 20 studies with 2076 participants. Eighteen studies were suitable for meta-analysis. A small positive effect was found for indicated programs compared to controls on self-reported anxiety symptoms at post-test (g = - 0.28, CI = - 0.50, - 0.05, k = 18). This benefit was maintained at 6 (g = - 0.35, CI = - 0.58, - 0.13, k = 9) and 12 months (g = - 0.24, CI = - 0.48, 0.00, k = 4). Based on two studies, > 12 month effects were very small (g = - 0.01, CI = - 0.38, 0.36). No differences were found based on intervention intensity or control type. Risk of bias and variability between studies was high (I

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapyAdolescentAnxietyChildEarly interventionMeta-analysisSchool-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID32535656
PMCPMC8140963
OpenAlexW3035280077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.