Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32535511›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2020

Psychological distress in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic: Preliminary development of an assessment scale.

Lin-Sen Feng, Zheng-Jiao Dong, Ruo-Yu Yan, Xiao-Qian Wu, Li Zhang, Jun Ma, Yong Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a COVID-related psychosocial experiences questionnaire for cancer survivors.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Adaptation of the Turkish version of the obsession with COVID-19 scale (TR-OCS): its association with psychological distress and resilience.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lin-Sen FengThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan 653100, China. Electronic address: since52@163.com.
Zheng-Jiao DongSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan 650500, China. Electronic address: dzj0912@163.com.
Ruo-Yu YanThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan 653100, China.
Xiao-Qian WuThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan 653100, China.
Li ZhangSchool of Basic Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan 650500, China.
Jun MaThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan 653100, China.
Yong ZengThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan 653100, China. Electronic address: zengyong1388851038@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is now spreading worldwide, and poses some public mental health problems which requires close attention. This study aims to develop a scale of COVID-19 related psychological distress in healthy public (CORPD) to assess the severity of psychological distress in uninfected healthy populations. We compiled a 14-item scale which contains two dimensions- Anxiety & fear and Suspicion -using the classical measurement theory. 652 Chinese citizens consented and completed a survey through an online questionnaire APP. The reliability test showed that the scale had good internal consistency reliability and Split-Half reliability, and the validity test showed that it had good structure validity, content validity and criterion correlation validity. This scale can be used to assess the psychological distress of people in China and in other COVID-19-hit regions and countries. It also provides a reference for future studies on COVID-19 or other respiratory infectious diseases related public mental health.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusMental HealthPsychological DistressAdultAnxietyChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FearFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralCORPDCOVID-19Psychological distressReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID32535511
PMCPMC7278642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.