ArticleGait & posture2020
Gait event detection using a thigh-worn accelerometer.
Article in Gait & posture, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gait Event Detection From Thigh Segment Kinematics in Children With Crouch Gait.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based gait phase detection using shank-mounted IMU data: Classification approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Monitoring Gait Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Wearable Sensors: Responsiveness of Gait Accelerations.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Observational
- Thigh-Worn Sensor for Measuring Initial and Final Contact During Gait in a Mobility Impaired Population: Validation Study.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Determination of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Using a Smartphone's IMU in the Pocket: Threshold-Based and Deep Learning Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantifying Asymmetric Gait Pattern Changes Using a Hidden Markov Model Similarity Measure (HMM-SM) on Inertial Sensor Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Determination of Gait Events and Temporal Gait Parameters for Persons with a Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Open-source dataset reveals relationship between walking bout duration and fall risk classification performance in persons with multiple sclerosis.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- How Much Data Is Enough? A Reliable Methodology to Examine Long-Term Wearable Data Acquisition in Gait and Postural Sway.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting vertical ground reaction forces from 3D accelerometry using reservoir computers leads to accurate gait event detection.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Article
- Wristbands Containing Accelerometers for Objective Arm Swing Analysis in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Real-World Postural Transitions as Biomarkers of Functional Impairment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGait event detection is critical for remote gait analysis. Algorithms using a thigh-worn accelerometer for estimating spatiotemporal gait variables have demonstrated clinical utility in monitoring the gait of patients with gait and balance impairment. However, one may obtain accurate estimates of spatiotemporal variables, but with biased estimates of foot contact and foot off events. Some biomechanical analyses depend on accurate gait phase segmentation, but previous studies using a thigh-worn accelerometer have not quantified the error in estimating foot contact and foot off events.
methodsGait events and spatiotemporal gait variables were estimated using a thigh-worn accelerometer from 32 healthy subjects across a range of walking speeds (0.56-1.78 m/s). Ground truth estimates were obtained using vertical ground reaction forces measured using a pressure treadmill. Estimation performance was quantified using absolute error, root mean square error, and correlation analysis.
resultsAcross all strides (N = 3,898), the absolute error in estimating foot contact, foot off, stride time, stance time, and swing time was similar to other accelerometer-based techniques (39 ± 28 ms, 28 ± 28 ms, 11 ± 14 ms, 46 ± 31 ms, and 45 ± 30 ms, respectively). The correlation between reference measurements and estimates of bout-average stride time, stance time, and swing time were 1.00, 0.92, and 0.80, respectively. The (5th, 95th) percentiles of the foot contact and foot off estimation errors were (-91 ms, 51 ms) and (-70 ms, 60 ms), the largest of which amounts to about three samples using the 31.25 Hz sampling frequency used in this study. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of the proposed algorithm for estimating spatiotemporal gait variables is supported by the strong correlations with reference measurements. The gait event estimation error distributions provide bounds on the estimated gait events for enforcing gait phase-dependent task constraints for biomechanical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.