ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2020
Permissive Hypertension and Collateral Revascularization May Allow Avoidance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Spinal cord protection in open and endovascular aortic surgery: current strategies, controversies and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Patterns of collateral arteries to the spinal cord after thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Collateral network concept in 2023.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Review
- Initial experience with a modified "candy-plug" technique for false lumen embolization in chronic type B aortic dissection.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023Article
- Lower-profile stent graft reduces the risk of embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair in shaggy aorta.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Changing Management of Type B Aortic Dissections.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023Review
- Safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for spinal cord ischemia prevention in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Current state of hybrid solutions for aortic arch aneurysms.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Review
- Commentary: Protecting the artery of Adamkiewicz: Highest imperative.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- Intercostal artery incorporation to prevent spinal cord ischemia during total endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) for prevention of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) remains unclear. We previously published our institutional algorithm restricting preoperative CSFD to patients deemed high risk for SCI. Since that publication, our algorithm has evolved with preoperative CSFD avoided in all patients undergoing isolated descending TEVAR with or without arch involvement (+/- arch TEVAR). This study evaluated the updated algorithm in a contemporary cohort.
methodsPatients who underwent TEVAR for descending aortic +/-arch pathology between February 2012 and September 2018 at a single center were identified from an institutional aortic surgery database. The algorithm includes left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization in cases of coverage with no preservation of antegrade flow, permissive hypertension, and use of evoked potential monitoring. The primary end points were SCI or postoperative CSFD.
resultsDuring the study interval, 225 patients underwent descending +/- arch TEVAR. CSFD was used before TEVAR in 2 patients (0.9%) in violation of the algorithm, and they were excluded from the study cohort. Endograft coverage below T6 occurred in 81%. The LSA was fully covered in 100 patients (47%), all of whom underwent LSA revascularization. Following the updated algorithm, the incidence of temporary or permanent SCI was 0%. No patient required postoperative CSFD.
conclusionsA restrictive lumbar CSFD algorithm, including permissive hypertension and LSA revascularization in the setting of descending +/- arch TEVAR, appears safe, with a 0% incidence of SCI in 223 consecutive patients treated during a 6.5-year interval. We recommend consideration of further prospective study to evaluate this algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.