Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32534906›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2021

The outbreak of coronavirus disease in China: Risk perceptions, knowledge, and information sources among prenatal and postnatal women.

Tsorng-Yeh Lee, Yaping Zhong, Jie Zhou, Xiaojuan He, Rui Kong, Ji Ji

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on vaccine decisions in pregnant women.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2022
    Article
  8. Perspectives of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tsorng-Yeh LeeSchool of Nursing, York University, Canada. Electronic address: tsylee@yorku.ca.
Yaping ZhongSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Australia. Electronic address: yaping.zhong1@monash.edu.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, PR China. Electronic address: 13905214180@163.com.
Xiaojuan HeDepartment of Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, PR China. Electronic address: 416163638@qq.com.
Rui KongDepartment of Obstetrics, Sir Run Run Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, PR China. Electronic address: Kr19890521@163.com.
Ji JiDepartment of Nursing, Sir Run Run Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, PR China. Electronic address: jiji@njmu.edu.cn.
Nanjing Medical University · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNMonash University · AUYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has created anxiety among members of the public, including all women over the childbirth continuum, who are considered to be at a greater risk of contracting most infectious diseases. Understanding the perspectives of health care consumers on COVID-19 will play a crucial role in the development of effective risk communication strategies. This study aimed to examine COVID-19-related risk perceptions, knowledge, and information sources among prenatal and postnatal Chinese women during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA cross-sectional survey design was adopted, and a four-section online questionnaire was used to collect data. Using a social media platform, the online survey was administered to 161 participants during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Nanjing, China, in February 2020.

resultsThe participants perceived their risk of contracting and dying from COVID-19 to be lower than their risk of contracting influenza, however many of them were worried that they might contract COVID-19. The participants demonstrated adequate knowledge about COVID-19. The three major sources from which they obtained information about COVID-19 were doctors, nurses/midwives, and the television, and they placed a high level of confidence in these sources. There was no significant relationship between the perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 and knowledge about this disease.

conclusionThe present findings offer valuable insights to healthcare professionals, including midwives, who serve on the frontline and provide care to pregnant women. Although the participants were adequately knowledgeable about COVID-19, they had misunderstood some of the recommendations of the World Health Organisation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnxietyChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Social MediaChinaCOVID-19Information sourcesKnowledgePerceived riskPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32534906
PMCPMC7256526
OpenAlexW3028920883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.