Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32534731›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Pulse pressure variation guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial].

Alessandro De Cassai, Ottavia Bond, Silvia Marini, Giulio Panciera, Lucrezia Furian, Flavia Neri, Giulio Andreatta, Paolo Rigotti, Paolo Feltracco

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Volemia and kidney transplantation].Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália. Electronic address: alessandro.decassai@gmail.com.
Ottavia BondUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália.
Silvia MariniUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália.
Giulio PancieraUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália.
Lucrezia FurianPadua University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Unit, Pádua, Itália.
Flavia NeriPadua University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Unit, Pádua, Itália.
Giulio AndreattaUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália.
Paolo RigottiPadua University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Unit, Pádua, Itália.
Paolo FeltraccoUniversity of Padova, Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padova, Itália.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end stage renal disease. Although different hemodynamic variables, like central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure, have been used to guide volume replacement during surgery, the best strategy still ought to be determined. Respiratory arterial Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) is recognized to be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization in operating room settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a PPV-guided fluid management strategy is better than a liberal fluid strategy during kidney transplantation surgeries. Identification of differences in urine output in the first postoperative hour was the main objective of this study.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 40 patients who underwent kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Patients randomized in the PPV Group received fluids whenever PPV was higher than 12%, patients in the Free Fluid Group received fluids following our institutional standard care protocol for kidney transplantations (10mL.kg

resultsUrinary output was similar at every time-point between the two groups, urea was statistically different from the third postoperative day with a peak at the fourth postoperative day and creatinine showed a similar trend, being statistically different from the second postoperative day. Urea, creatinine and urine output were not different at the hospital discharge.

conclusionPPV-guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation significantly improves urea and creatinine levels in the first week after kidney transplantation surgery.

Indexed as

Blood PressureKidney TransplantationFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIntraoperative CareKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodCreatininaCreatinineFluidoterapiaFluid therapyKidney transplantationTransplante renalUreaUreiaUrinaUrine

Identifiers

PMID32534731
PMCPMC9373208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.