Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32534571›Full record

ReviewBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Definitions of poor outcome after total knee arthroplasty: an inventory review.

Malou E M Te Molder, José M H Smolders, Petra J C Heesterbeek, Cornelia H M van den Ende

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A validated outcome categorization of the knee society score for total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malou E M Te MolderSint Maartenskliniek Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, P.O. box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.teMolder@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-8771
José M H SmoldersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Petra J C HeesterbeekSint Maartenskliniek Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, P.O. box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia H M van den EndeDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of patients experiences poor response (i.e. no or little improvement) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) because of osteoarthritis. It is difficult to quantify the proportion of patients who experiences poor response to TKA, as different definitions of, and perspectives (clinician's and patient's) on poor response are being used. The aim of this study was therefore to review the literature and summarize definitions of poor response to TKA.

methodsA systematic search was performed to identify and review studies that included dichotomous definitions of poor outcome after primary TKA. The type, amount and combination of domains (e.g. functioning), outcome measures, type of thresholds (absolute/relative, change/cut-off), values and moments of follow-up used in definitions were summarized.

resultsA total of 47 different dichotomous definitions of poor response to TKA were extracted from 2163 initially identified studies. Thirty-six definitions incorporated one domain, seven definitions comprised two domains and four definitions comprised three domains. Eight different domains were used in identified definitions: pain, function, physical functioning, quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction, anxiety, depression and patient global assessment. The absolute cut-off value was the most common type of threshold, with large variety in value and timing of follow-up.

conclusionsOur inventory review shows that definitions of poor response to TKA are heterogeneous. Our findings stresses the need for an unambiguous definition of poor response to draw conclusions about the prevalence of poor-responders to TKA across hospitals and countries, and to identify patients at risk.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeOsteoarthritis kneePatient-reported outcome measuresPoor outcomeTotal knee arthroplastyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID32534571
PMCPMC7293790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.