Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533939›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

Improving the Accuracy of Protein Thermostability Predictions for Single Point Mutations.

Jianxin Duan, Dmitry Lupyan, Lingle Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibody Affinity Maturation by Computational Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. ΦX174 bacteriophage viability predicted by protein biophysical modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How to Sample Dozens of Substitutions per Site with λ Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Selection pressures on evolution of ribonuclease H explored with rigorous free-energy-based design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianxin DuanSchrödinger GmbH, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: jianxin.duan@schrodinger.com.
Dmitry LupyanSchrödinger Inc., New York, New York.
Lingle WangSchrödinger Inc., New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting the protein thermostability changes upon single point mutations in silico is a challenge that has implications for understanding diseases as well as industrial applications of protein engineering. Free energy perturbation (FEP) has been applied to predict the effect of single point mutations on protein stability for over 40 years and emerged as a potentially reliable prediction method with reasonable throughput. However, applications of FEP in protein stability calculations in industrial settings have been hindered by a number of limitations, including the inability to model mutations to and from prolines in which the bonded topology of the backbone is modified and the complexity in modeling charge-changing mutations. In this study, we have extended the FEP+ protocol to enable the accurate modeling of the effects on protein stability from proline mutations and from charge-changing mutations. We also evaluated the influence of the unfolded model in the stability calculations using increasingly longer peptides with native sequence and conformations. With the abovementioned improvements, the accuracy of FEP predictions of protein stability over a data set of 87 mutations on five different proteins has drastically improved compared with previous studies, with a mean unsigned error of 0.86 kcal/mol and root mean square error of 1.11 kcal/mol, comparable with the accuracy of previously published state-of-the-art small-molecule relative binding affinity calculations, which have been shown to be capable of driving discovery projects.

Indexed as

Point MutationProteinsEntropyPeptidesProtein StabilityThermodynamicsPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID32533939
PMCPMC7335905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.