ArticleNeurosurgery2020
Epidural Oscillating Cardiac-Gated Intracranial Implant Modulates Cerebral Blood Flow.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modifying the ICP pulse wave: effects on parenchymal blood flow pulsatility.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe have previously reported a method and device capable of manipulating ICP pulsatility while minimally effecting mean ICP.
objectiveTo test the hypothesis that different modulations of the intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse waveform will have a differential effect on cerebral blood flow (CBF).
methodsUsing an epidural balloon catheter attached to a cardiac-gated oscillating pump, 13 canine subjects underwent ICP waveform manipulation comparing different sequences of oscillation in successive animals. The epidural balloon was implanted unilaterally superior to the Sylvian sulcus. Subjects underwent ICP pulse augmentation, reduction and inversion protocols, directly comparing time segments of system activation and deactivation. ICP and CBF were measured bilaterally along with systemic pressure and heart rate. CBF was measured using both thermal diffusion, and laser doppler probes.
resultsThe activation of the cardiac-gate balloon implant resulted in an ipsilateral/contralateral ICP pulse amplitude increase with augmentation (217%/202% respectively, P < .0005) and inversion (139%/120%, P < .0005). The observed changes associated with the ICP mean values were smaller, increasing with augmentation (23%/31%, P < .0001) while decreasing with inversion (7%/11%, P = .006/.0003) and reduction (4%/5%, P < .0005). CBF increase was observed for both inversion and reduction protocols (28%/7.4%, P < .0001/P = .006 and 2.4%/1.3%, P < .0001/P = .003), but not the augmentation protocol. The change in CBF was correlated with ICP pulse amplitude and systolic peak changes and not with change in mean ICP or systemic variables (heart rate, arterial blood pressure).
conclusionCardiac-gated manipulation of ICP pulsatility allows the study of intracranial pulsatile dynamics and provides a potential means of altering CBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.