ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2020
Noninvasive prenatal testing as compared to chorionic villus sampling is more sensitive for the detection of confined placental mosaicism involving the cytotrophoblast.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Repeat cell-free DNA screening after initial false-positive results and term placental analysis for confined mosaicism: a prospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Deep genome sequencing reveals extensive genetic heterogeneity in early human placentas.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Art (and Science) of Individualized Selection of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS).International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Performance of Massive Parallel Sequencing-Based Cell-Free DNA Testing in Compromised Pregnancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Test Versus Chorionic Villus Sampling, Where Are We Now?Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Single-cell whole-genome sequencing, haplotype analysis in prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Article
- Editorial: Unravelling the basis of non-invasive prenatal screening results.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Genetics Etiologies Associated with Fetal Growth Restriction.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2022Review
- Pregnancy outcomes of rare autosomal trisomies results in non-invasive prenatal screening: clinical follow-up data from a single tertiary centre.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Genetic variation in placental insufficiency: What have we learned over time?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Multisite assessment of the impact of cell-free DNA-based screening for rare autosomal aneuploidies on pregnancy management and outcomes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Reply: The missing role of diagnosis of confined placental mosaicism in the management of fetal growth restriction.Human reproduction update · 2021Article
- Confined placental mosaicism of trisomy 6 detected through genome-wide NIPT was associated with placental abruption.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2021Article
- Patient-friendly integrated first trimester screening by NIPT and fetal anomaly scan.Molecular cytogenetics · 2021Article
- Noninvasive prenatal testing as compared to chorionic villus sampling is more sensitive for the detection of confined placental mosaicism involving the cytotrophoblast.Prenatal diagnosis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.