ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020
Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gaze dynamics of cued speech perception.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Audiovisual Perception of Lexical Stress: Beat Gestures and Articulatory Cues.Language and speech · 2025Article
- Adaptions in eye-movement behavior during face-to-face communication in noise.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The McGurk effect is similar in native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Evidence for a Causal Dissociation of the McGurk Effect and Congruent Audiovisual Speech Perception via TMS to the Left pSTS.Multisensory research · 2024Article
- Localizing 3D motion through the fingertips: Following in the footsteps of elephants.iScience · 2024Article
- The noisy encoding of disparity model predicts perception of the McGurk effect in native Japanese speakers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Evidence for a Causal Dissociation of the McGurk Effect and Congruent Audiovisual Speech Perception via TMS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Spatial and temporal (non)binding of audiovisual rhythms in sensorimotor synchronisation.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020Article
- The Cross-Modal Suppressive Role of Visual Context on Speech Intelligibility: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Seeing a talker's face can aid audiovisual (AV) integration when speech is presented in noise. However, few studies have simultaneously manipulated auditory and visual degradation. We aimed to establish how degrading the auditory and visual signal affected AV integration. Where people look on the face in this context is also of interest; Buchan, Paré and Munhall (Brain Research, 1242, 162-171, 2008) found fixations on the mouth increased in the presence of auditory noise whilst Wilson, Alsius, Paré and Munhall (Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(4), 601-615, 2016) found mouth fixations decreased with decreasing visual resolution. In Condition 1, participants listened to clear speech, and in Condition 2, participants listened to vocoded speech designed to simulate the information provided by a cochlear implant. Speech was presented in three levels of auditory noise and three levels of visual blurring. Adding noise to the auditory signal increased McGurk responses, while blurring the visual signal decreased McGurk responses. Participants fixated the mouth more on trials when the McGurk effect was perceived. Adding auditory noise led to people fixating the mouth more, while visual degradation led to people fixating the mouth less. Combined, the results suggest that modality preference and where people look during AV integration of incongruent syllables varies according to the quality of information available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.