Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533499›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2020

Using Real-World Data to Predict Clinical and Economic Benefits of a Future Drug Based on its Target Product Profile.

Christoph Gerlinger, Thomas Evers, Jeremy Rassen, Richard Wyss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph GerlingerStatistics and Data Insights, Bayer AG, Müllerstraße 178, 13353, Berlin, Germany. christoph.gerlinger@bayer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-6413
Thomas EversGlobal Market Access, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.
Jeremy RassenAetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-7381
Richard WyssDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor a new drug to be developed, the desired properties are described in a target product profile.

objectiveWe propose a framework for using real-world data to measure the disease-specific costs of the current standard of care and then to project the costs of the proposed new product for early data-driven portfolio decisions to select drug candidates for development.

methodsWe sampled from a cohort of patients representing the current standard of care to generate a hypothetical cohort of patients that fits a given target product profile for a new (hypothetical) treatment. The healthcare costs were determined and compared between standard of care and the new treatment. The approach differed according to the number of outcomes defined in the target product profile, and the cases for one, two, and three outcome variables are described.

resultsBased on assumed hypothetical treatment effect, absolute risk and cost reductions were estimated in a worked example. The median costs per day for one patient were estimated to be $10.37 and $8.39 in the original and hypothetical cohorts, respectively. This means that the assumed target product profile would result in cost savings of $1.98 per day and patient-not accounting for any additional drug costs.

conclusionsWe present a simple approach to assess the potential absolute clinical and economic benefit of a new drug based on real-world data and its target product profile. The approach allows for early data-driven portfolio decisions to select drug candidates based on their expected cost savings.

Identifiers

PMID32533499
PMCPMC7392984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.