ArticleEJNMMI research2020
Human biodistribution and internal dosimetry of 4-[
Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facile and Practical Synthesis of Substituted Piperidine-2,6-Diones Under Transition-Metal Free Condition.ChemistryOpen · 2025Article
- Radionuclide Imaging of Heart-Brain Connections.Heart failure clinics · 2025Review
- Intranasal Radioiodinated Ferulic Acid Polymeric Micelles as the First Nuclear Medicine Imaging Probe for ETRA Brain Receptor.Current radiopharmaceuticals · 2024Article
- Imaging Cholinergic Receptors in the Brain by Positron Emission Tomography.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Review
- Radionuclide Imaging of Heart-Brain Connections.Cardiology clinics · 2023Review
- Molecular Imaging in Parkinsonian Disorders-What's New and Hot?Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Update on PET Tracer Development for Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background4-[
methodDose calculations were based on activity uptake derived from multiple time point whole body PET CT imaging and the organ-specific dosimetric S-factors derived from the ICRP 133 standard man and woman mathematical phantoms. Effective doses were calculated using the latest ICRP tissue weighting factors.
resultsSerial images and time activity curves demonstrate high brain and left ventricular myocardial uptake (5% and 0.65% of injected activity, respectively) with greater retention in brain than myocardium. The mean effective dose was in concordance with other
conclusionsThe radiation dose associated with an administration of F-DEX is comparable to that of other
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.