Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533402›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Expression analysis of defense-related genes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) against Phytophthora melonis.

Lida Hashemi, Ahmad Reza Golparvar, Mehdi Nasr-Esfahani, Maryam Golabadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. L-Lysine fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The mutant STAY-GREEN (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lida HashemiDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmad Reza GolparvarDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. dragolparvar@gmail.com.
Mehdi Nasr-EsfahaniPlant Protection Research Department, Isfahan Agriculture and Natural Resource Research and Education Center (AREEO), Isfahan, Iran. mne2011@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6753-147X
Maryam GolabadiDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan · IRSoil Conservation and Watershed Management Research · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytophthora melonis is one of the most destructive cucumber disease, causing severe economic losses in the globe. Despite intense research efforts made in the past years, no permanent cure currently exists for this disease. With the aim to understand the molecular mechanisms of defense against P. melonis, root collars and leaves of four cucumber genotypes consisting of resistant Ramezz; moderately resistant Baby, and very susceptible Mini 6-23 and Extrem, were monitored for quantitative gene expression analysis of the five antifungal and/or anti-oomycete genes (CsWRKY20, CsLecRK6.1, PR3, PR1-1a and LOX1), at three points after inoculation with P. melonis. The gene expression analysis indicated, P. melonis strongly enhanced the expression of these genes after inoculation, in both the leaves and root collars. Further, not only the transcript levels of these genes were significantly higher in resistant and moderately resistance genotypes, but also the time point of the highest relative expression ratio for the five genes was different in the four cucumber genotypes. CsWRKY20 and PR3 showed the maximum expression in Ramezz at 48 h post inoculation (hpi) while CsLecRK6.1, and LOX1 showed the highest expression at 72 hpi. In addition, PR1-1a showed the maximum expression in the Baby at 72 hpi. Root collars responded faster than leaves, and some responses were more strongly up-regulated in root collars than in leaves. The genes found to be involved in disease resistance in two different organs of cucumber after pathogen infection. The results suggest that increased expression of these genes led to activation of defense pathways, and could be responsible for a reduced P. melonis colonization capacity in Ramezz and Baby. Overall, this work represents a valuable resource for future functional genomics studies to unravel molecular mechanisms of Cucumis sativus-P. melonis interaction.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenes, PlantChitinasesCucumis sativusLipoxygenasePhytophthoraPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsChitinasesLipoxygenasePlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsCsLecRK6CsWRKY20Damping-offGene expressionGenotypesLOX1

Identifiers

PMID32533402
OpenAlexW3035080840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.