ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2020
Comparing the fate of brain metastatic breast cancer cells in different immune compromised mice with cellular magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency Survey of Brain Metastases and Its Associated Factors Among Iranian Women with Breast Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study in Tehran City.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- An Insight into Molecular Targets of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Preclinical Models of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- A method for the efficient iron-labeling of patient-derived xenograft cells and cellular imaging validation.Journal of biological methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Metastasis is the leading cause of mortality in breast cancer patients, with brain metastases becoming increasingly prevalent. Studying this disease is challenging due to the limited experimental models and methods available. Here, we used iron-based cellular MRI to track the fate of a mammary carcinoma cell line (MDA-MB-231-BR) in vivo to characterize the growth of brain metastases in the nude and severely immune-compromised NOD/SCID/ILIIrg-/- (NSG) mouse. Nude and NSG mice received injections of iron-labeled MDA-MB-231-BR cells. Images were acquired with a 3T MR system and assessed for signal voids and metastases. The percentage of signal voids and the number and volume of metastases were quantified. Ex vivo imaging of the liver, histology, and immunofluorescence labeling was performed. Brain metastases grew more rapidly in NSG mice. At day 21 post cell injection, the average number of brain tumors in NSG mice was approximately four times greater than in nude mice. The persistence of iron-labeled cells, visualized as signal voids by MRI, was also examined. The percentage of voids decreased significantly over time for both nude and NSG mice. Body images revealed that the NSG mice also had metastases in the liver, lungs, and lymph nodes while tumors were only detected in the brains of nude mice. This work demonstrates the advantages of using the highly immune-compromised NSG mouse to study breast cancer metastasis, treatments aimed at inhibiting metastasis and outgrowth of breast cancer metastases in multiple organs, and the role that imaging can play toward credentialing these models that cannot be done with other in vitro or histopathologic methods alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.