Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533359›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food.

Crinan Jarrett, Luke L Powell, Heather McDevitt, Barbara Helm, Andreanna J Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Urban biodiversity in the Anthropocene.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Crinan JarrettInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-0149
Luke L PowellInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-4982
Heather McDevittInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-9008
Barbara HelmInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. b.helm@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6648-1463
Andreanna J WelchDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, UK. a.j.welch@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-4695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly increasing urbanisation requires mitigation against associated losses of biodiversity and species abundance. In urban-breeding birds, altered food availability for nestlings is thought to reduce reproductive success compared to forest populations. To compensate for shortages of preferred foods, urban parents could increase their search effort for optimal diets or provision other foods. Here, we used telemetry and faecal metabarcoding on blue tits from one urban and one forest populations to compare parental effort and comprehensively describe nestling diet. Urban parents travelled on average 30% further than those in the forest, likely to offset limited availability of high-quality nestling food (i.e. caterpillars) in cities. Metabarcoding, based on a mean number of 30 identified taxa per faeces, revealed that the diets of urban chicks were nonetheless substantially shifted to include alternative foods. While in the forest caterpillars comprised 82 ± 11% of taxa provisioned to nestlings, in the city they constituted just 44 ± 10%. Pre-fledging chick mass as well as offspring numbers were lower in urban than in forest-reared broods. Thus, at least in our comparison of two sites, the hard labour of urban parents did not fully pay off, suggesting that improved habitat management is required to support urban-breeding birds.

Indexed as

SongbirdsAnimalsCitiesDietFruitTelemetryBlue titFaecalProvisioningReproductionUrbanisation

Identifiers

PMID32533359
PMCPMC7320956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.