Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533357›Full record

ArticleOecologia2020

Interactions between artificial light at night, soil moisture, and plant density affect the growth of a perennial wildflower.

Melissa H Hey, Elizabeth DiBiase, Deborah A Roach, David E Carr, Kyle J Haynes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa H HeyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA. mh5rd@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2202
Elizabeth DiBiasePennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, PA, 17110, USA.
Deborah A RoachDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
David E CarrDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Kyle J HaynesDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
University of Virginia · USPennsylvania Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1156796National Science Foundation 1659816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) has been shown to alter aspects of plant growth, but we are not aware of any studies that have examined whether the effects of ALAN on plants depend upon the backdrop of variation in other abiotic factors that plants encounter in field populations. We conducted a field experiment to investigate whether ALAN affects the growth and anti-herbivore defenses of common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca, and whether the effects of ALAN are influenced by plant density or soil moisture content. Artificial light at night, soil moisture, and plant density were manipulated according to a split-plot factorial design. Although increasing soil moisture by watering had no significant effects on latex exudation, attributes of plant growth generally responded positively to watering. The basal stem diameter (BSD) and height of plants were affected by ALAN × soil moisture interactions. For both of these variables, the positive effects of ALAN were greater for plants that were not watered than for plants that were. Basal stem diameter was also affected by an ALAN × plant density interaction, and the positive effect of ALAN on BSD was greater in the low-density treatment than in the high-density treatment. Our results demonstrate that the effects of ALAN on plant growth can be altered by soil moisture and plant density. Consequently, the effects of ALAN on plants in nature may not be consistent with existing frameworks that do not account for critical abiotic variables such as water availability or biotic interactions between plants such as competition.

Indexed as

AsclepiasSoilHerbivoryPlantsWaterSoilWaterCommunity ecologyLight pollutionMilkweedPrecipitationSensory pollution

Identifiers

PMID32533357
OpenAlexW3035507236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.