Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533265›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study.

Oscar Salomó-Coll, Beatriz Auriol-Muerza, Naroa Lozano-Carrascal, Federico Hernández-Alfaro, Hom-Lay Wang, Jordi Gargallo-Albiol

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar Salomó-CollOral and Maxillo-facial Surgery Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, c/Josep Trueta s/n, 08195, Barcelona, Spain. oscarsalomo@uic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-1363
Beatriz Auriol-MuerzaOral and Maxillo-facial Surgery Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, c/Josep Trueta s/n, 08195, Barcelona, Spain.
Naroa Lozano-CarrascalOral and Maxillo-facial Surgery Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, c/Josep Trueta s/n, 08195, Barcelona, Spain.
Federico Hernández-AlfaroOral and Maxillo-facial Surgery Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, c/Josep Trueta s/n, 08195, Barcelona, Spain.
Hom-Lay WangDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jordi Gargallo-AlbiolOral and Maxillo-facial Surgery Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, c/Josep Trueta s/n, 08195, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of bone type, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on heat generation while performing osteotomy for dental implants. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix polyurethane foam blocks simulating type I (dense) and type IV (soft) bone were selected for the study. Each block was subjected to two different experimental conditions for each drill (2- and 3.5-mm diameter): three sub-groups were created: (a) revolutions per minute (50, 100, or 800 rpm) and (b) irrigation (with or without irrigation).

resultsIn 2-mm drill group, maximum temperature attained was practically identical: 23.73 ± 2.28 °C in the cortical bone and 23.74 ± 2.03 °C in the cancellous bone. For 3.5-mm, groups showed similar results (25.01 ± 1.88 °C for cortical and 24.05 ± 1.94 °C for trabecular bone). In any type of bone, the presence of irrigating fluid helped to control the maximum temperature (p = 0.001). When comparing the 2-mm and 3.5-mm drills, most differences were found at 100 rpm without irrigation (p < 0.001) and at 800 rpm with irrigation (p = 0.001).

conclusionsMaximum temperature attained was always below the critical threshold that can cause osteonecrosis, showing that both external irrigation with higher drilling speeds and no irrigation with lower speeds were effective methods to avoid excessive heat generation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite being always below the critical temperature, bone type, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation must be considered temperature-influencing factors during implant osteotomies.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDental ImplantsDental Implantation, EndosseousHot TemperatureOsteotomyTemperatureTherapeutic IrrigationDental ImplantsBone mineral densityDental implantImplant drillIn vitroPolyurethane foam

Identifiers

PMID32533265
OpenAlexW3034721859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.