Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533257›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Validation of the Early Language Scale.

Margot I Visser-Bochane, Cees P van der Schans, Wim P Krijnen, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Margreet R Luinge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margot I Visser-BochaneResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.i.visser-bochane@pl.hanze.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-7583
Cees P van der SchansResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wim P KrijnenResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Margreet R LuingeResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 200330002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the criterion validity of a new screening instrument, the Early Language Scale (ELS), for the identification of young children at risk for developmental language disorder (DLD), and to determine optimal age-adjusted cut-off scores. We recruited a community-based sample of 265 children aged 1 to 6 years of age. Parents of these children responded on the ELS, a 26-item "yes-no" questionnaire. The children were assessed with extended language tests (language comprehension, word production, sentence production, communication). A composite score out of these tests (two tests below - 1 SD or one below - 1.5 SD) was used as reference standard. We assessed the validity of the ELS, measured by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and AUC. The optimal sensitivity/specificity age-dependent cut-off ELS score was at 15th percentile. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 and 0.93, respectively. Positive predictive value was moderate (0.53), negative predictive value was high (0.95), the positive likelihood ratio was 9.16, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.41. The area under the ROC curve was 0.88. The items covered the increasing language development for the ages from 1 to 6.Conclusion: The ELS is a valid instrument to identify children with DLD covering an age range of 1 to 6 years in community-based settings. What is Known: • Early identification and treatment of developmental language disorders can reduce negative effects on children's emotional functioning, academic success, and social relationships. • Short, validated language screening instruments that cover the full age range of early childhood language development lack. What is New: • The 26-item Early Language Scale (ELS) is a valid instrument to identify children at risk for developmental language disorder in well-child care and early educational settings among Dutch children aged 1-6 years.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersMass ScreeningChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLanguageROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityChild health surveillanceDevelopmental language disorder (DLD)Language developmentPreventionScreening

Identifiers

PMID32533257
PMCPMC7782443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.