Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533249›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Advancing clinical response characterization to frontotemporal transcranial direct current stimulation with electric field distribution in patients with schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations: a pilot study.

Marine Mondino, Clara Fonteneau, Louis Simon, Clément Dondé, Frédéric Haesebaert, Emmanuel Poulet, Jerome Brunelin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marine MondinoINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Clara FonteneauINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Louis SimonINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Clément DondéINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Frédéric HaesebaertINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel PouletINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France.
Jerome BrunelinINSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; PSYR2 Team, 95 bd pinel, F-69000, Lyon, France. jerome.brunelin@ch-le-vinatier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-5628
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a therapeutic option for treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in schizophrenia. In such cases, repeated sessions of tDCS are delivered with the anode over the left prefrontal cortex and the cathode over the left temporoparietal junction. Despite promising findings, the clinical response to tDCS is highly heterogeneous among patients. Here, we explored baseline differences between responders and nonresponders to frontotemporal tDCS using electric field modeling. We hypothesized that responders would display different tDCS-induced electric field strength in the brain areas involved in AVH compared to nonresponders.Using baseline structural MRI scans of 17 patients with schizophrenia and daily AVH who received 10 sessions of active frontotemporal tDCS, we constructed individual realistic whole brain models estimating electric field strength. Electric field maps were compared between responders (n = 6) and nonresponders to tDCS (n = 11) using an independent two-sample t test. Clinical response was defined as at least a 50% decrease of AVH 1 month after the last tDCS session.Results from the electric field map comparison showed that responders to tDCS displayed higher electric field strength in the left transverse temporal gyrus at baseline compared to nonresponders (T = 2.37; p = 0.016; 32 voxels).These preliminary findings suggested that the strength of the tDCS-induced electric field reaching the left transverse temporal gyrus could play an important role in the response to frontotemporal tDCS. In addition, this work suggests the interest of using electric field modeling to individualize tDCS and increase response rate.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionFrontal LobeTemporal LobeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultDouble-Blind MethodElectricityFemaleHallucinationsHumansMalePilot ProjectsSchizophreniaAuditory hallucinationsElectric fieldModelingSchizophreniatDCS

Identifiers

PMID32533249
OpenAlexW3035473490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.