ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2020
Determining factors for optimal neuronal and glial Golgi-Cox staining.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Resolution Single-Neuron Reconstruction Analysis in Golgi-Stained Brain Tissues.Cell proliferation · 2026Article
- Reshaping the gut microbiota: A novel oppinion of Eucommiae cortex polysaccharide alleviate learning and memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Golgi-Cox Staining Protocol for Medium Spiny Neurons in the Striatum of Neonatal and Early Postnatal Mouse Brain Using Cryosections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning-based Pipeline for Segmenting the Cerebral Cortex Laminar Structure in Histology Images.Neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021Article
- A combinatorial method to visualize the neuronal network in the mouse spinal cord: combination of a modified Golgi-Cox method and synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021Article
- Optimized Golgi-Cox Staining Validated in the Hippocampus of Spared Nerve Injury Mouse Model.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Golgi staining allows for the analysis of neuronal arborisations and connections and is considered a powerful tool in basic and clinical neuroscience. The fundamental rules for improving neuronal staining using the Golgi-Cox method are not fully understood; both intrinsic and extrinsic factors may control the staining process. Therefore, various conditions were tested to improve the Golgi-Cox protocol for vibratome-cut rat brain sections. Optimal staining of cortical neurons was achieved after 72 h of impregnation. Well-stained neurons in both cortical and subcortical structures were observed after 96 h of impregnation. The dendritic arborisation pattern of cortical neurons derived from the 72-h impregnation group was comparable to those of the 96 and 168-h impregnation groups. The entire brain was stained well when the pH of the Golgi-Cox solution was 6.5 and that of the sodium carbonate solution was 11.2. Lack of brain perfusion or perfusion with 0.9% NaCl did not influence optimal neuronal staining. Perfusion with 37% formaldehyde, followed by impregnation, only resulted in glial staining, but perfusion with 4% formaldehyde facilitated both glial and neuronal staining. Whole brains required longer impregnation times for better staining. Although every factor had a role in determining optimal neuronal staining, impregnation time and the pH of staining solutions were key factors among them. This modified Golgi-Cox protocol provides a simple and economical procedure to stain both neurons and glia separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.