Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533234›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2020

Determining factors for optimal neuronal and glial Golgi-Cox staining.

Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan, Laxminarayana Kurady Bairy, Suresh Kumar Srinivasamurthy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sareesh Naduvil NarayananDepartment of Physiology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, PO Box 11172, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. sareeshnn@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-2352
Laxminarayana Kurady BairyDepartment of Pharmacology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, PO Box 11172, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
Suresh Kumar SrinivasamurthyDepartment of Pharmacology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, PO Box 11172, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Golgi staining allows for the analysis of neuronal arborisations and connections and is considered a powerful tool in basic and clinical neuroscience. The fundamental rules for improving neuronal staining using the Golgi-Cox method are not fully understood; both intrinsic and extrinsic factors may control the staining process. Therefore, various conditions were tested to improve the Golgi-Cox protocol for vibratome-cut rat brain sections. Optimal staining of cortical neurons was achieved after 72 h of impregnation. Well-stained neurons in both cortical and subcortical structures were observed after 96 h of impregnation. The dendritic arborisation pattern of cortical neurons derived from the 72-h impregnation group was comparable to those of the 96 and 168-h impregnation groups. The entire brain was stained well when the pH of the Golgi-Cox solution was 6.5 and that of the sodium carbonate solution was 11.2. Lack of brain perfusion or perfusion with 0.9% NaCl did not influence optimal neuronal staining. Perfusion with 37% formaldehyde, followed by impregnation, only resulted in glial staining, but perfusion with 4% formaldehyde facilitated both glial and neuronal staining. Whole brains required longer impregnation times for better staining. Although every factor had a role in determining optimal neuronal staining, impregnation time and the pH of staining solutions were key factors among them. This modified Golgi-Cox protocol provides a simple and economical procedure to stain both neurons and glia separately.

Indexed as

Staining and LabelingAnimalsGolgi ApparatusMaleNeurogliaNeuronsRatsRats, WistarTissue FixationCortexFormalinGliaGolgi-Cox stainingHippocampusNeuron

Identifiers

PMID32533234
OpenAlexW3034757956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.