ReviewHerz2020
Emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their relevance for the cardiovascular system.
Review in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The interplay between recovery and immunity in infectious and non-communicable diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Cellular Alterations in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Anthracycline Therapy Modifies Immune Checkpoint Signaling in the Heart.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Myocarditis and Cardiomyopathy: A Translational Review.Biology · 2023Review
- Nuclear medicine in the assessment and prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity: prospects and proposal of use by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Cardiac Remodelling Following Cancer Therapy: A Review.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2022Review
- Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy induces an immune response against cancer cells. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has tremendously improved the prognosis for a large number of cancers, but is associated with considerable immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cardiovascular complications from ICI therapy occur in a modest proportion of patients, but show the highest lethality rates of all ICI-related complications. While ICI-related myocarditis is the most dangerous complication, its clinical manifestation varies, e.g., asymptomatic reduction of left ventricular function, isolated increase in cardiac troponins, and arrhythmias. This review delineates current data on cardiovascular complications of ICI therapy. The effects of ICI therapy on the cardiovascular system are classified in the context of preclinical data on the biochemical and immunological function of the immune checkpoint signaling pathways in the heart and the vascular system. Incidence, suspected pathomechanisms, typical symptoms, as well as recommended diagnostics are summarized. Current therapy recommendations for ICI-related cardiotoxicity are outlined and innovative new approaches with high potential for improving outcome in ICI-related myocarditis are delineated. A better understanding of cardiovascular complications is essential for the best possible oncocardiology care of the growing number of patients undergoing ICI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.