Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533211›Full record

ReviewHNO2020

Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application.

J Dlugaiczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Vestibular Hypersensitivity in Patients with Chronic Noise Exposure.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J DlugaiczykDeutsches Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtszentrum (DSGZ), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. julia.dlugaiczyk@gmx.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are increasingly being used for testing otolith organ function.

objectiveThis article provides an overview of the anatomical, biomechanical and neurophysiological principles underlying the evidence-based clinical application of ocular and cervical VEMPs (oVEMPs and cVEMPs). MATERIAL AND

methodsSystematic literature search in PubMed until April 2019.

resultsSound and vibration at a frequency of 500 Hz represent selective vestibular stimuli for the otolith organs. The predominant specificity of oVEMPs for contralateral utricular function and of cVEMPs for ipsilateral saccular function is defined by the different central projections of utricular and saccular afferents. VEMPs are particularly useful in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence and otolith organ specific vestibular dysfunction and as an alternative diagnostic approach in situations when video oculography is not possible or useful.

conclusionThe use of VEMPs is a simple, safe, reliable and selective test of dynamic function of otolith organs.

Indexed as

Vestibular DiseasesVestibular Evoked Myogenic PotentialsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeurophysiologyOtolithic MembraneVibrationBone conductionOtolithic membraneVestibular evoked myogenic potentialsVestibular neuritisVibration

Identifiers

PMID32533211
PMCPMC7403168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.