Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32533045›Full record

Trial reportSpinal cord2020

General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS-IT) in people with spinal cord injury: a psychometric study.

Francescaroberta Panuccio, Giovanni Galeoto, Maria Auxiliadora Marquez, Maria Letizia Grassi, Alessia Scialpi, Marco Tofani, Anna Berardi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francescaroberta PanuccioSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni GaleotoDepartment of Public Health, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy. giovanni.galeoto@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-5686
Maria Auxiliadora MarquezParaplegic Center of Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Maria Letizia GrassiSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessia ScialpiSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco TofaniNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Neurorehabilitation Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-4513
Anna BerardiSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-5303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designPsychometric study.

objectiveThis study sought to analyze the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS-IT) in a population of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

settingItaly.

methodsIts reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while its concurrent validity was assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient in relation to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The obtained scores were compared with the cut-off score for the GSDS-IT among a healthy Italian population (38.5).

resultsThe GSDS-IT was administered to 57 participants with SCI who were recruited from all over Italy. The GSDS-IT was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.76) and good test-retest reliability (ICC of 0.7), and it showed positive and significant values for all the PSQI domains. Based on the cut-off score of 38.5, 56% of participants tested positive for sleep disturbances upon admission (t0), while among the randomized participants submitted for the test-retest after 24 h (t1), 75% tested positive for sleep disturbances.

conclusionThe GSDS-IT is a valid, reliable, and time-efficient tool for measuring sleep disturbances over the past week in a population with SCI.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSleepSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.