ArticleScientific reports2020
Direct incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells into a Nanofiber scaffold - in vitro and in vivo analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate supports three-dimensional osteogenic differentiation of human iPS cells without surface coating.Bone reports · 2026Article
- Electrospun Polycaprolactone (PCL) Nanofibers Induce Elongation and Alignment of Co-Cultured Primary Cortical Astrocytes and Neurons.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Article
- Integration of Electrospun Scaffolds and Biological Polymers for Enhancing the Delivery and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell Therapies.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2024Review
- Nanofiber Carriers of Therapeutic Load: Current Trends.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A biomimetic orthogonal-bilayer tubular scaffold for the co-culture of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bony defects are a common problem in musculoskeletal surgery. Replacement with autologous bone grafts is limited by availability of transplant material. Sterilized cancellous bone, while being osteoconductive, has limited osteoinductivity. Nanofiber scaffolds are currently used for several purposes due to their capability of imitating the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, they allow modification to provide functional properties. Previously we showed that electrospun nanofiber scaffolds can be used for bone tissue regeneration. While aiming to use the osteoinductive capacities of collagen type-I nanofibers we saw reduced scaffold pore sizes that limited cellular migration and thus colonization of the scaffolds. Aim of the present study was the incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells into the electrospinning process of a nanofiber scaffold to produce cell-seeded nanofiber scaffolds for bone replacement. After construction of a suitable spinning apparatus for simultaneous electrospinning and spraying with independently controllable spinning and spraying devices and extensive optimization of the spinning process, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the resulting scaffolds was conducted. Stem cells isolated from rat femora were incorporated into PLLA (poly-l-lactide acid) and PLLA-collagen type-I nanofiber scaffolds (PLLA Col I Blend) via simultaneous electrospinning and -spraying. Metabolic activity, proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation were assessed in vitro. For in vivo evaluation scaffolds were implanted into critical size defects of the rat scull. After 4 weeks, animals were sacrificed and bone healing was analyzed using CT-scans, histological, immunhistochemical and fluorescence evaluation. Successful integration of mesenchymal stem cells into the scaffolds was achieved by iteration of spinning and spraying conditions regarding polymer solvent, spinning distance, the use of a liquid counter-electrode, electrode voltage and spinning duration. In vivo formation of bone tissue was achieved. Using a PLLA scaffold, comparable results for the cell-free and cell-seeded scaffolds were found, while the cell-seeded PLLA-collagen scaffolds showed significantly better bone formation when compared to the cell-free PLLA-collagen scaffolds. These results provide support for the future use of cell-seeded nanofiber scaffolds for large bony defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.