Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532783›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

What narrative devices do people with systemic sclerosis use to describe the experience of pain from digital ulcers: a multicentre focus group study at UK scleroderma centres.

Jennifer Jones, Michael Hughes, John Pauling, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Andrew J Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer JonesHealth Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-6092
Michael HughesCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John PaulingDepartment Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Rachael Gooberman-HillMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew J MooreMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK a.j.moore@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3185-1599
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDigital ulcers (DUs) are a common complication in systemic sclerosis (SSc). No existing studies have specifically reported on the qualitative patient experience of DU pain, and our current patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) does not capture the multifaceted painful experience of SSc-DU. Our aim was to examine the patient experience of SSc-DU pain.

designFocus groups with people diagnosed with SSc who had experienced DUs were conducted using a topic guide developed by people with SSc, experts in SSc and experienced qualitative researchers. Focus groups were continued until data saturation had been reached. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Our current study is an integration of the data from these focus groups to specifically examine the patient experience of DU pain.

settingThree specialist scleroderma units across the UK (Bath, Manchester and London).

participantsFour focus groups were undertaken; 29 adults (20 women, 9 men) with SSc and a spectrum of historical DUs participated. We included participants with a diverse demographic (including ethnic) background and disease-related characteristics.

resultsFive narrative devices were identified, which encompass how people describe the pain from SSc-DUs: 'Words to express DU-associated pain', 'Descriptions of physical and psychological reactions to pain', 'Comparisons with other painful events', 'Descriptions of factors that exacerbate pain' and 'Descriptions of strategies for coping with the pain'.

conclusionThe experience of SSc-DU pain leads to the use of graphic language and rich description by participants in the focus group setting. Existing SSc-DU outcomes do not adequately capture the patient experiences of SSc-DU pain. Our findings further highlight the multifaceted nature of SSc-DUs and will hopefully support the development of a novel PROM to assess the severity and impact of SSc-DUs.

Indexed as

FingersNarrationPain MeasurementAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedScleroderma, SystemicSkin UlcerUnited Kingdompain managementqualitative researchrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID32532783
PMCPMC7295424
OpenAlexW3033967011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.