Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532779›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Improving gender equity in critical care medicine: a protocol to establish priorities and strategies for implementation.

Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Chloe de Grood, Sofia Ahmed, Karen Bosma, Karen E A Burns, Robert Fowler, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Sangeeta Mehta, Tina Mele, Sharon E Straus and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ISCCM Position Statement for Improving Gender Balance in Critical Care Medicine.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jeanna Parsons LeighSchool of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada j.parsonsleigh@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8408-674X
Chloe de GroodDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sofia AhmedDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen BosmaDivision of Critical Care Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Karen E A BurnsCritical Care, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert FowlerInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison Fox-RobichaudDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3606
Sangeeta MehtaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tina MeleDivision of Critical Care Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6617-9790
Sharon E StrausInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nubia ZepedaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Laryssa KempDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kirsten FiestDepartments of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Psychiatry & Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-6594
Henry Thomas StelfoxO'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile the number of women entering medical school now equals or surpasses the number of men, gender equity in medicine has not been achieved. Women continue to be under-represented in leadership roles (eg, deans, medical chairs) and senior faculty positions. In addition, women do not enter medical specialties as often as men, which can have important implications for work environment, reimbursement and the delivery of patient care. Compared with other medical specialties (eg, anaesthesiology, dermatology, etc), critical care medicine is a medical specialty with some of the lowest representation of women. While strategies to improve gender equity in critical care medicine exist in the published literature, efforts to comprehensively synthesise, prioritise and implement solutions have been limited.The objective of this programme of work is to establish priorities for the development and implementation of key strategies to improve the outcomes, well-being and experiences of women in critical care in Canada. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three phases encompass this programme of work. In phase I, we will catalogue published strategies focused on improving gender inequity across medical specialties through a scoping review. In phase II, we will conduct a modified Delphi consensus process with decision-makers, physicians and researchers to identify key strategies (identified in phase I and proposed by participants in phase II) for improving gender inequity in the specialty of critical care medicine. Finally, in phase III, we will conduct a 1-day stakeholder meeting that engages participants from phase II to build capacity for the development and implementation of top ranked strategies. Data analyses from this programme of work will be both quantitative and qualitative. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed programme of work is a foundational step towards establishing targeted strategies to improve gender inequity in the medical specialty of critical care medicine. Strategies will be prioritised by stakeholders, mapped to preidentified drivers of gender equity in the specialty and be scalable to institutional needs. A final report of our results including the list of top prioritised strategies and implementation objectives will be disseminated to panel participants, critical care leadership teams and major critical care societies who are partners in this work, around the country to facilitate uptake at the local level.The University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board has approved this study (REB16-0890).

Indexed as

Critical CareGender EquityCanadaFemaleHumansPhysicians, WomenResearch Designgeneral medicine (see internal medicine)health services administration & managementintensive & critical careprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID32532779
PMCPMC7295422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.