Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532746›Full record

ReviewCancer discovery2020

Targeting

Gonzalo Recondo, Jianwei Che, Pasi A Jänne, Mark M Awad

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer discovery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Improvement of Diagnostics in NSCLC Patients withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gonzalo RecondoLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-1019
Jianwei CheDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-4811
Pasi A JänneLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. mark_awad@dfci.harvard.edu pasi_janne@dfci.harvard.edu.
Mark M AwadLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. mark_awad@dfci.harvard.edu pasi_janne@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Resistance and Sensitivity to MET Inhibitors in Lung CancerR01CA222823 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI JANNE, PASI A · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant MET signaling can drive tumorigenesis in several cancer types through a variety of molecular mechanisms including

Indexed as

HumansNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID32532746
PMCPMC7781009
OpenAlexW3035138898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.