ArticleEuropean urology2020
Standardized Nomenclature and Surveillance Methodologies After Focal Therapy and Partial Gland Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus.
Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HERMES Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial To Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Differences Between Indwelling Catheter And Temporary Prostatic Stent In Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Procedures For The Treatment Of Localized Prostate Cancer Or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Jupiter Registry: Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Is there a role of PSMA-PET in focal therapy planning and follow-up?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Oncological results and cancer control definition in focal therapy for Prostate Cancer: a systematic review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Functional outcomes and safety of focal therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review on results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of endourology · 2022Pooled it
- Pathologic failure and salvage approaches following focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Performance of PI-FAB and TARGET scoring systems in post focal therapy mpMRI surveillance.Research square · 2026Article
- Results from the PRESERVE trial: an editorial commentary.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting 1-Year Trifecta Outcomes After High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Cryoablation for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- KLS-3021, a multifunctional oncolytic virus, demonstrates potent early-intervention efficacy in preclinical models of prostate-confined and locally advanced prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Focal irreversible electroporation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Multimodality focal therapy for prostate cancer: outcome of theProstate international · 2025Article
- Longitudinal MRI changes after focal therapy for prostate cancer: cryotherapy vs. microwave tissue coagulation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- External validation of inter-reader reliability of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system following focal cryoablation and focal high-intensity focused ultrasound.European radiology · 2025Article
- Imaging in focal therapy: advanced ultrasound imaging and mpMRI-a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic predictors of prostate cancer recurrence following focal cryotherapy: a pooled analysis of phase II trial and prospective cohort data.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Salvage treatments after focal therapy for prostate cancer - a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Surveillance after Focal Therapy - a Comprehensive Review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Identifying the best candidate for focal therapy: a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFocal therapy (FT) and partial gland ablation (PGA) are quickly adopted by urologists and radiologists as an option for the management of localized prostate cancer.
objectiveTo find consensus on a standardized nomenclature and to define a follow-up guideline after FT and PGA for localized prostate cancer in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA review of the literature identified controversial topics in the field of FT. Online questionnaires were distributed to experts during three rounds, with the goal to achieve consensus on debated topics. The consensus project was concluded with a face-to-face meeting in which final conclusions were formulated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Controlled feedback of responses of previous rounds were summarized and returned to the participants allowing them to re-evaluate their decisions. The level of agreement to achieve consensus on a topic was set at 80%. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty-five experts participated in this interdisciplinary consensus study (72% urologists; 28% radiologists). The experts propose the use of the herein standardized nomenclature for ablative procedures. After FT/PGA, the following tests should be performed to assess treatment outcomes: prostate-specific antigen (PSA), imaging, biopsies, and functional outcome assessment. Although not a reliable marker for treatment failure, PSA should be measured every 3 mo in the 1st year and every 6 mo thereafter. Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred image modality and should be performed at 6 and 18 mo after treatment. A systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy combined with a targeted biopsy of the treated area should be performed 6-12 mo after treatment. Functional outcomes should be obtained 3-6 mo after treatment for the first time and until stability is attained.
conclusionsThe panel recommends the use of the proposed nomenclature and follow-up protocols to generate reliable data supporting a broader implementation of FT as a standard of care for select patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we present expert opinion on the use of a standardized nomenclature, and surveillance methodologies after focal therapy and partial gland ablation for localized prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.