ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020
Wrist-worn wearables based on force myography: on the significance of user anthropometry.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wearable and Implantable Devices for Continuous Monitoring of Muscle Physiological Activity: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Insights into motor impairment assessment using myographic signals with artificial intelligence: a scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Low Back Exoskeletons in Industry 5.0: From Machines to Perceiving Co-Pilots-A State-of-the-Art Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Kirigami-Inspired Stretchable Piezoelectret Sensor for Analysis and Assessment of Parkinson's Tremor.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- A survey on the state of the art of force myography technique (FMG): analysis and assessment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Review
- Feasibility of force myography for the direct control of an assistive robotic hand orthosis in non-impaired individuals.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Wearable super-resolution muscle-machine interfacing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForce myography (FMG) is a non-invasive technology used to track functional movements and hand gestures by sensing volumetric changes in the limbs caused by muscle contraction. Force transmission through tissue implies that differences in tissue mechanics and/or architecture might impact FMG signal acquisition and the accuracy of gesture classifier models. The aim of this study is to identify if and how user anthropometry affects the quality of FMG signal acquisition and the performance of machine learning models trained to classify different hand and wrist gestures based on that data.
methodsWrist and forearm anthropometric measures were collected from a total of 21 volunteers aged between 22 and 82 years old. Participants performed a set of tasks while wearing a custom-designed FMG band. Primary outcome measure was the Spearman's correlation coefficient (R) between the anthropometric measures and FMG signal quality/ML model performance.
resultsResults demonstrated moderate (0.3 ≤|R| < 0.67) and strong (0.67 ≤ |R|) relationships for ratio of skinfold thickness to forearm circumference, grip strength and ratio of wrist to forearm circumference. These anthropometric features contributed to 23-30% of the variability in FMG signal acquisition and as much as 50% of the variability in classification accuracy for single gestures.
conclusionsIncreased grip strength, larger forearm girth, and smaller skinfold-to-forearm circumference ratio improve signal quality and gesture classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.