Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532358›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020

Wrist-worn wearables based on force myography: on the significance of user anthropometry.

Mona Lisa Delva, Kim Lajoie, Mahta Khoshnam, Carlo Menon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mona Lisa DelvaMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, Unit 250, 13450 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Kim LajoieMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, Unit 250, 13450 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2065-1535
Mahta KhoshnamMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, Unit 250, 13450 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Carlo MenonMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, Unit 250, 13450 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. cmenon@sfu.ca.
Simon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForce myography (FMG) is a non-invasive technology used to track functional movements and hand gestures by sensing volumetric changes in the limbs caused by muscle contraction. Force transmission through tissue implies that differences in tissue mechanics and/or architecture might impact FMG signal acquisition and the accuracy of gesture classifier models. The aim of this study is to identify if and how user anthropometry affects the quality of FMG signal acquisition and the performance of machine learning models trained to classify different hand and wrist gestures based on that data.

methodsWrist and forearm anthropometric measures were collected from a total of 21 volunteers aged between 22 and 82 years old. Participants performed a set of tasks while wearing a custom-designed FMG band. Primary outcome measure was the Spearman's correlation coefficient (R) between the anthropometric measures and FMG signal quality/ML model performance.

resultsResults demonstrated moderate (0.3 ≤|R| < 0.67) and strong (0.67 ≤ |R|) relationships for ratio of skinfold thickness to forearm circumference, grip strength and ratio of wrist to forearm circumference. These anthropometric features contributed to 23-30% of the variability in FMG signal acquisition and as much as 50% of the variability in classification accuracy for single gestures.

conclusionsIncreased grip strength, larger forearm girth, and smaller skinfold-to-forearm circumference ratio improve signal quality and gesture classification accuracy.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaWearable Electronic DevicesWristAdultAnthropometryBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMyographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBiosignal qualityForce myographyMachine learningUser anthropometryWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID32532358
PMCPMC7291722
OpenAlexW3035016433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.