Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532231›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

The validity and reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening depression in primary health care patients in Botswana.

Keneilwe Molebatsi, Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi, Grace Nduku Wambua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on depression in older Australian adults.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of depression and association with quality-of-life among oncology patients at Princess Marina Hospital, Botswana: A cross-sectional study.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keneilwe MolebatsiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Private Bag, 00713, Gaborone, Botswana. keneilwekmolebatsi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-3278
Keneilwe MotlhatlhediDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Grace Nduku WambuaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
University of Botswana · BWUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

University of Botswana Office of Research and Development Internal funding Round 36 research grant for early career researchers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of locally validated screening instruments contributes to poor detection of depression in primary care. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a brief and freely available screening tool which was developed for primary care settings; however, its accuracy may be affected by the population in which it is administered. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of PHQ-9 for screening depression in a primary care population in Botswana.

methodsData was collected from a conveniently selected sample of 257 adult primary care attendants. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) depression module was used as a gold standard to assess criterion validity.

resultsSensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-9 for screening for major depression were 72.4 and 76.3 respectively at a cut off score of nine or more. The area under the ROC curve was 0.808. The PHQ-9 demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha of 0.799. Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant correlation (r = 0.528, p < 0.001) between PHQ-9 and the MINI. Significant negative correlation between PHQ-9 scores and all four domains of the WHO quality of life questionnaire- brief version scores demonstrated good convergent validity.

conclusionsThe PHQ-9 is a reliable and valid instrument to screen for depression in primary care facilities in Botswana. Primary care clinicians in Botswana may use the PHQ-9 to screen for depression with a cut -off score of nine. Further studies should focus on integrating routine depression screening in primary care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultBotswanaDepressionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient Health QuestionnaireQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultBotswanaDepressionPatient Health Questionnaire-9Primary health careReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID32532231
PMCPMC7291492
OpenAlexW3035639124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.