Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32532227›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study.

Camilla Rahr Tatari, Berit Andersen, Trine Brogaard, Sara Koed Badre-Esfahani, Negin Jaafar, Pia Kirkegaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The experiences of minority language users in health and social care research: A systematic review.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Knowledge of High School Students About Cancers of the Genital System.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla Rahr TatariDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark. catata@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5129-3582
Berit AndersenDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Trine BrogaardLaegerne i Gellerup, Brabrand, Denmark.
Sara Koed Badre-EsfahaniDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Negin JaafarDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pia KirkegaardDepartment of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening programmes for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer have been implemented in many Western countries to reduce cancer incidence and mortality. Ethnic minority women are less likely to participate in cancer screening than the majority population. In worst case this can result in higher incidence rates, later diagnosis and treatment and ultimately inferior survival. In this paper we explored the perceptions about cancer and perceived barriers towards cancer screening participation among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark.

methodsInterview study with ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim followed by an inductive content analysis.

resultsCancer was perceived as a deadly disease that could not be treated. Cancer screening was perceived as only relevant if the women had symptoms. Knowledge about cancer screening was fragmented, often due to inadequate Danish language skills and there was a general mistrust in the Danish healthcare system due to perceived low medical competences in Danish doctors. There was, however, a very positive and curious attitude regarding information about the Danish cancer screening programmes and a want for more information.

conclusionEthnic minority women did not have sufficient knowledge about cancer and the purpose of cancer screening. Perceptions about cancer screening were characterised by openness and the study showed positive and curious attitudes towards screening participation. The findings emphasise the importance of culturally adapted interventions for ethnic minority women in attempts to reduce inequality in screening participation.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBreast NeoplasmsDenmarkEarly Detection of CancerEthnicityFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicSocioeconomic FactorsWomen's Health ServicesDenmarkEarly detection of CancerEmigrants and immigrantsEthnic groupsHealthcare disparitiesMass screeningNon-participationParticipationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32532227
PMCPMC7291658
OpenAlexW3035673113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.