ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020
Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: a tutorial for practitioners.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Agreement of Intraocular Pressure from Four Mechanistically Different Tonometers in the Eye Dynamics and Engineering Network Clinical Trial.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaTrial
- Glomerular filtration rate estimation in nephrotic patients: creatinine and/or cystatin-C-based equations, or none of them?Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Electronic Medical Records for Quantifying Rates of Sedative and Analgesic Infusions for Acute Disorders of Consciousness in Big Data Research.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Fully automated artificial intelligence-based echocardiographic analysis for global longitudinal strain monitoring and cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction detection in breast cancer patients.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Feasibility of the Meta Quest 3 for upper limb kinematic analysis: accuracy, consistency, agreement and reliability.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Concordance-Based Validation of Electronic Health Records and Modality Log Files to Improve MRI Exam Duration Prediction and Scheduling Performance.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of ankle versus arm oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure in detecting hypotension during shoulder surgery in the beach-chair position: A prospective observational study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Accuracy in the Estimation of Self-Reported Knee Brace Wear Time in Young Adults With a Symptomatic Knee Following ACL Reconstruction: Secondary Analysis of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- AI-based synthetic CT attenuation correction enables reliable quantitative SPECT in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Validation of olive-castor oil (OL-C) blend as a bio-membrane model.RSC advances · 2026Article
- A scoping review of statistical methods for the analysis of method comparison studies with repeated measurements of clinical data.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Article
- Stride-level measurement of gait as an early sensitive marker of disability progression in ambulatory patients with multiple sclerosis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Repeatability and agreement of planar lumbar range of motion measured by dynamic fluoroscopy and optical motion capture in an ovine cadaveric model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Validation of markerless human pose estimation methods for clinical assessment of elbow range of motion.PloS one · 2026Article
- Fatty acid intakes in healthy adults quantified using a food frequency questionnaire compared with red blood cell membrane fatty acid content: A validation study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Article
- Validity of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based, Markerless Pose Estimation System Compared to a Marker-Based 3D Motion Analysis System for Gait Assessment-A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Straight Lines to Curved Paths: Validity and Reliability of Linear Position Transducers to Assess Linear and Angular Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Agreement Between TDK Silmee W22 and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for Estimating Daily Step Counts and Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity in Free-Living Adults: Comparative Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Noninvasive Method Using Mechanical Extensometer for the Estimation of Intracranial Compliance by Repeated Measures Agreement Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies of agreement examine the distance between readings made by different devices or observers measuring the same quantity. If the values generated by each device are close together most of the time then we conclude that the devices agree. Several different agreement methods have been described in the literature, in the linear mixed modelling framework, for use when there are time-matched repeated measurements within subjects.
methodsWe provide a tutorial to help guide practitioners when choosing among different methods of assessing agreement based on a linear mixed model assumption. We illustrate the use of five methods in a head-to-head comparison using real data from a study involving Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients and matched repeated respiratory rate observations. The methods used were the concordance correlation coefficient, limits of agreement, total deviation index, coverage probability, and coefficient of individual agreement.
resultsThe five methods generated similar conclusions about the agreement between devices in the COPD example; however, some methods emphasized different aspects of the between-device comparison, and the interpretation was clearer for some methods compared to others.
conclusionsFive different methods used to assess agreement have been compared in the same setting to facilitate understanding and encourage the use of multiple agreement methods in practice. Although there are similarities between the methods, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses which are important for researchers to be aware of. We suggest that researchers consider using the coverage probability method alongside a graphical display of the raw data in method comparison studies. In the case of disagreement between devices, it is important to look beyond the overall summary agreement indices and consider the underlying causes. Summarising the data graphically and examining model parameters can both help with this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.